Clear structure
Menus and page groups should make the range of available experiences easy to scan.
Our editorial approach
How we compare gaming sites
A clear look at the practical details behind our guides: how a site is organised, what it offers, and how clearly it explains the experience.
Explore the factors
01 / Find your way
Navigation that feels understandable
We consider whether the main areas are easy to locate and whether labels help visitors know what they will find.
Useful signposting
Categories and filters can help people narrow a broad selection without adding needless steps.
Consistent labels
Names should stay familiar as visitors move between an overview and its details.
02 / See the range
Variety, with context
A catalogue is more useful when its breadth is described in context. We look for visible ways to browse different game types and understand what is available.
Our comparisons describe variety in words. The mix can change over time, so a guide should avoid presenting a snapshot as a permanent promise.
03 / The experience
Performance and ease of use
We pay attention to whether common tasks feel straightforward, while recognising that speed and availability can vary by connection and device.
- 01
Reach the main content
Can a visitor find the games and key information without excessive detours?
- 02
Follow the page flow
Are actions and supporting details presented in a sequence that makes sense?
- 03
Understand the limits
Do loading, access, or availability notes explain what may affect the experience?
04 / Across devices
Compatibility and access
We review how clearly a platform describes supported browsers, operating systems, and devices.
Compatibility can depend on software versions and local settings. We look for useful guidance and avoid treating one successful visit as a promise for every setup.
05 / Read the details
Platform information in plain view
Useful platform details should be discoverable and written in language people can follow.
About the platform
We note whether basic service and access information is easy to find.
Availability notes
We look for clear explanations of restrictions or conditions that may apply.
Changing details
When information can change, our guide should make that uncertainty clear.
How we write
Useful context over unsupported scores
Our goal is to explain differences a reader can inspect for themselves. We do not publish a made-up points system or imply that every platform has been tested in identical conditions.
Editorial summaries should reflect the information available at the time of writing. Where a detail is uncertain or changeable, the language should say so.
Keeping guides useful
Details can change
Game libraries, features, and access information are not static. We aim to revisit the details that matter to a comparison and make the limits of a guide clear.
Readers should check a platform directly for its latest information before making a decision.
A clearer comparison
Have a question about our approach?
We welcome thoughtful feedback about the information in our guides and how it is presented.
